AP invoice automation
Supplier invoices matched three-way against PO and goods receipt before anything posts.
For medical and life-sciences distributors and manufacturers, a new supplier, product or invoice has to clear the rules before it touches the ERP. We validate every record through staged gates, route only the genuine exceptions to a person and write the clean ones straight through.
Vendor, item and customer setup drags across weeks and delays revenue, because the same data is re-entered and everything routes to a person, not just the exceptions.
Admin begins when the PO arrives, not when the agreement is signed, baking a revenue delay into the process.
Vendor, item and customer details keyed again into separate forms and systems instead of captured once.
Dozens of creation forms routed to senior staff for completeness checks rather than real decisions.
Every item routed for regulatory review even though under a fifth genuinely need it.
Three-way matching across PO, goods receipt and invoice done manually, line by line.
Duplicates and inconsistent records spread across systems, with no single source of truth.
Each one removes manual work while keeping a person on every risk decision.
Supplier invoices matched three-way against PO and goods receipt before anything posts.
New suppliers and products validated against the rules and created once, not re-keyed everywhere.
Only the items that genuinely need regulatory review reach QA/RA, the rest clear automatically.
Contracts and product documents read and turned into structured records on arrival.
Invoice and document extraction are cross-industry agents. Master-data onboarding and QA/RA triage are specialised builds for regulated operations.
For a medical distribution and manufacturing operation, gated validation cuts the regulatory load and the time to a usable record. Figures are illustrative of a typical engagement.
The automation connects to your ERP through its API or service layer. A person approves before anything is created.
Don't see your system here? Ask us anyway, chances are we already support it.
No. The automation connects to your ERP through its API or service layer, whether that is SAP, NetSuite, Dynamics or another system. It reads and writes records; it does not replace anything.
Rules and classification route only the items that genuinely need regulatory review to QA/RA, with a reason recorded for the rest. A person always approves the regulatory decision. The agent never approves risk by itself.
No. Every record moves through three explicit states: validated draft, approved for writeback, then created in the ERP. A person approves before anything is written. Nothing posts on its own.
Every request passes validation gates before creation: completeness, glossary match, duplicate check, then finance and regulatory exceptions. Only failed gates route to a person; passed gates become the audit trail.
You own everything we build, we never train models on your data and the build is aligned to your local privacy and regulatory requirements. Every step is logged for audit.